home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: coranto.ucs.mun.ca!bmontgom
- From: bmontgom@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Byron Montgomerie)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: New Press Release!
- Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Date: 17 Mar 1996 19:56:25 GMT
- Organization: Memorial University of Newfoundland
- Message-ID: <4ihqp9$294@coranto.ucs.mun.ca>
- References: <4hp1cr$in5@infa.central.susx.ac.uk> <DnyI1B.Gnz@info.uucp>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: plato.ucs.mun.ca
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Reg Martin (mart4372@mach1.wlu.ca) wrote:
- : Alan L.M. Buxey (kcci1@central.susx.ac.uk) wrote:
- : : Karl Thomas posted the following:
- : :
- : : : Since when was a 68030/40 "good computing power".
- : :
- : : oh dear - you have been getting used to using bad over bloated OS's pon
- : : other platforms that NEED big CPU power....the AmigaOS allows a lot
- : : within the power of an 030.
-
- : Sure it does, but it doesn't by any means allow enough. The C64 could
- : do some pretty cool stuff considering its power too, but so what?
- : An 030 should have been included in the 600. An 030 or 040 should have
- : been included in the 1200. Today anything less than an 060 in a new
- : computer is pretty insane. Maybe not for AT, but for their customers.
-
- : Good thing AT has enough insane potential customers to make the new
- : computer a success though. :)
-
- Chuckle! :) My thoughts exactly. :)
-
- Regards,
-
- BM
-
-